On 1/18/18 7:51 AM, MD wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu> wrote:


On 1/17/18 6:11 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:

Hi,

If you poke your finger into something, it isn't going to stay flat. :-)

And to add on to this, in the CHARMM parametrization protocol, the first
step is always an in vacuo geometry optimization (QM vs. MM comparison) to
make sure the topology is sensible. If that doesn't check out, there are
problems that can be easily spotted before subjecting the new residue to
any other complicating factors like water and other parts of the protein.

-Justin

​​Thank you Justin. What would you look at to make a judgement to see if
the topology is sensible after the vacuo geometry optimization? Or as long
as there were no errors or bad notes along the run it should be good?

You look at the structure to see if it is sensible (and here, sensible is defined as properly reproducing QM-optimized geometries and/or known high-resolution experimental geometries - start with QM and compare against empirical evidence later).

The absence of errors or notes when executing grompp tells you precisely nothing about the integrity of the physical model; it only tells you if you've forgotten to do something. I can populate every parameter field with absolute garbage and grompp will happily carry on preparing my doomed simulation :)

-Justin

--
==================================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry

303 Engel Hall
340 West Campus Dr.
Blacksburg, VA 24061

jalem...@vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
http://www.biochem.vt.edu/people/faculty/JustinLemkul.html

==================================================

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Reply via email to