** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
       Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली
भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764956

Title:
  Guests using IBRS incur a large performance penalty

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Trusty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Xenial:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  the IBRS would be mistakenly enabled in the host when the switching
  from an IBRS-enabled VM and that causes the performance overhead in
  the host. The other condition could also mistakenly disables the IBRS
  in VM when context-switching from the host. And this could be
  considered a CVE host.

  [Fix]
  The patch fixes the logic inside the x86_virt_spec_ctrl that it checks
  the ibrs_enabled and _or_ the hostval with the SPEC_CTRL_IBRS as the
  x86_spec_ctrl_base by default is zero. Because the upstream
  implementation is not equal to the Xenial's implementation. Upstream
  doesn't use the IBRS as the formal fix. So, by default, it's zero.

  On the other hand, after the VM exit, the SPEC_CTRL register also
  needs to be saved manually by reading the SPEC_CTRL MSR as the MSR
  intercept is disabled by default in the hardware_setup(v4.4) and
  vmx_init(v3.13). The access to SPEC_CTRL MSR in VM is direct and
  doesn't trigger a trap. So, the vmx_set_msr() function isn't called.

  The v3.13 kernel hasn't been tested. However, the patch can be viewed
  at:
  
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/gavinguo/ubuntu-trusty-amd64.git/log/?h=sf00191076-sru

  The v4.4 patch:
  
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/gavinguo/ubuntu-xenial.git/log/?h=sf00191076-spectre-v2-regres-backport-juerg

  [Test]

  The patch has been tested on the 4.4.0-140.166 and works fine.

  The reproducing environment:
  Guest kernel version: 4.4.0-138.164
  Host kernel version: 4.4.0-140.166

  (host IBRS, guest IBRS)

  - 1). (0, 1).
  The case can be reproduced by the following instructions:
  guest$ echo 1 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/ibrs_enabled
  1

  <Several minutes later...>

  host$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/ibrs_enabled
  0
  host$ for i in {0..55}; do sudo rdmsr 0x48 -p $i; done
  11111111111111000000000000000000010010100000000000000000

  Some of the IBRS bit inside the SPEC_CTRL MSR are mistakenly
  enabled.

  host$ taskset -c 5 stress-ng -c 1 --cpu-ops 2500
  stress-ng: info:  [11264] defaulting to a 86400 second run per stressor
  stress-ng: info:  [11264] dispatching hogs: 1 cpu
  stress-ng: info:  [11264] cache allocate: default cache size: 35840K
  stress-ng: info:  [11264] successful run completed in 33.48s

  The host kernel didn't notice the IBRS bit is enabled. So, the situation
  is the same as "echo 2 > /proc/sys/kernel/ibrs_enabled" in the host.
  And running the stress-ng is a pure userspace CPU capability
  calculation. So, the performance downgrades to about 1/3. Without the
  IBRS enabled, it needs about 10s.

  - 2). (1, 1) disables IBRS in host -> (0, 1) actually it becomes (0, 0).
  The guest IBRS has been mistakenly disabled.

  guest$ echo 2 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/ibrs_enabled
  guest$ for i in {0..55}; do sudo rdmsr 0x48 -p $i; done
  11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

  host$ echo 2 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/ibrs_enabled
  host$ for i in {0..55}; do sudo rdmsr 0x48 -p $i; done
  11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
  host$ echo 0 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/ibrs_enabled
  host$ for i in {0..55}; do sudo rdmsr 0x48 -p $i; done
  00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

  guest$ for i in {0..55}; do sudo rdmsr 0x48 -p $i; done
  00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1764956/+subscriptions

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~group.of.nepali.translators
Post to     : group.of.nepali.translators@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~group.of.nepali.translators
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to