Dear draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model authors, I understand that draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model is under status "Waiting for Implementation".
Please consider updating the RIB statistics with statistics currently being collected by BMP implementations https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7854#section-4.8 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8671#section-6.2 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9069#section-5.6 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats >From an operators perspective that would ease the future transition from >management plane (peer state and RIB statistics) metrics from BMP to YANG-Push. Best wishes Thomas https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-18#appendix-D | +--rw afi-safis | | +--rw afi-safi* [name] | | +--rw name identityref | | +--rw enabled? boolean | | +--ro statistics | | | +--ro total-paths? yang:gauge32 | | | +--ro total-prefixes? yang:gauge32 -----Original Message----- From: Graf Thomas, INI-NET-VNC-E2E Sent: Monday, May 19, 2025 8:32 AM To: [email protected] [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: grow-chairs <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [GROW] Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats (start 18/May/2025 end 1/Jun/2025) Dear grow, dear authors, I support the publication of this document. It sharpens the scope of the previously https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7854#section-4.8 defined Stats Reports and ads valuable statistical insights into suppressed, how-many paths left until threshold reached, ROA validation etc. This will ease network operation of the BGP process. I agree with the authors that type 0 wasn't much useful and the Type 22 definition is what network operators need. I like that all measured values are in gauges which require no post processing for TSDB ingestion. I reviewed the document. Please consider below editorial related remarks. DOCX: https://github.com/network-analytics/ietf-network-analytics-document-status/blob/main/document-review/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-08.docx PDF: https://github.com/network-analytics/ietf-network-analytics-document-status/blob/main/document-review/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-08.pdf I see that there is no document shepherd being assigned yet. In case you need one, I am happy to shepherd. Best wishes Thomas -----Original Message----- From: Paolo Lucente <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2025 7:51 PM To: [email protected] [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [GROW] Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats (start 18/May/2025 end 1/Jun/2025) Be aware: This is an external email. This email begins a two-week WGLC on: Definition For New BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) Statistics Types https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats/08/ Abstract: """ RFC 7854 defines different BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) statistics message types to observe events that occur on a monitored router. This document defines new statistics type to monitor BMP Adj-RIB-In and Adj-RIB-Out Routing Information Bases (RIBs). """ Please take time to review this draft and post comments by Jun 1st 2025. Questions, suggestions, supportive comments, and objections are welcomed. In parallel there will be another email shortly for the IPR poll. Paolo GROW co-chair _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
