Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:48:08PM -0400, Larry J. Blunk: > > A new MRT draft is now up. Diffs can be found at -- > http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-grow-mrt-00.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-grow-mrt-01.txt > > This updated draft adds a new OSPF type (OSPF_ET) which includes > both OSPFv3 (IPv6) and microsecond time resolution support. This the > microsecond > support for OSPF was requested by Simon Leinen.
Is microsecond time resolution not of general interest, for all non-deprecated types? Why not just split the MRT message type space in half; any types with the high bit set have a microsecond word following the header. I'd still like to see a "magic number" message that includes some identifier of the tool/collector which wrote the file. _________________________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/grow.html web archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/grow/
