Dean,
On 3-Dec-2005, at 00:29, Dean Anderson wrote:
[...]
The other 6 issues were not adequately addressed, in my view. I
think they
still remain issues. When the RFC issues, these will remain as
criticisms.
Whether these criticisms eventually discredit the RFC in the same
way that some
RFC2991 assertions have been discredited, remains to be seen. But
the WG
decision has been made, so lets move the process forward. Whether
there is wide
support or indifference is hard to tell. But the Chairs see a
consensus, and
I'm not disputing their judgement.
Thanks for your support of the process.
Rather, my interest now is to record that there were objections
raised at the
time. I'm willing to acknowledge that these objections were a
minority view.
I appreciate your attention to the accuracy of the record.
Indeed, I have no doubt that your objections to the text in question
(and to the anycast deployment of many types of services) is widely
recognised, in this, and in many other forums.
Joe
_________________________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/grow.html
web archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/grow/
