On May 17, 9:28 pm, Peter Hosey <[email protected]> wrote:
> On May 17, 2010, at 16:32:50, sourcehound wrote:
>
> > There's a school that says "a silent system is the best system." However, 
> > some admins would want to allow Cyberduck to use Growl notifications, but 
> > might want to disallow Mail.app from using Growl notifications.
>
> The existing solution to that specific example would be to simply not install 
> GrowlMail. ☺
>
> > A simple whitelist approach limits the notifications to "blessed" apps.
>
> Sounds good. Here's my proposal:
>
> A preference, named in the manifest, whose value (if set) is an array of 
> application names. If this preference is set, it is a white list; Growl will 
> accept registrations from other applications but ignore their notifications. 
> It should also show other applications' names in strike-through type in the 
> preference pane.
>

Peter,

I think you've nailed it perfectly. This would be just the ticket for
managing which applications can send growl alerts at the computer
level. I think with this option, many more Mac Managers would consider
including Growl on their standard images.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Growl Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to