On 8 Nov 2011, at 16:13, Travis Tilley <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since the Growl team would still be getting potential support requests and > issues for a third party build, I will put a note on the download page that discourages this. > it would be a bit more... courteous to change the name and artwork. Really? That implies a fork to me. > It's the same kind of respect CentOS gives RedHat when they do third party > builds of RedHat Enterprise Linux based on their freely provided source, and > the same reason RedHat requested that their name not be directly > associated... even if all the manuals and support documents were otherwise > copied word for word. I'll wait for Chris to request that, although this would simply be a "can't download from the MAS? Get it here..." type affair. It's not a fork; simply a compiled version. > > But then again, CentOS also provides at least a basic level of support, Indeed - I'm not and I'll be making that clear on the download page. > even if they haven't been that great at keeping up with upstream changes > lately. > > Source code is available, free, and under a significantly more permissive > license than the GPL. Anyone who wants to do it themselves can open xcode, > turn off code signing, and hit build. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Growl Discuss" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/growldiscuss/-/ceKaJg_6RFcJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
