Thanks for the clarification. I was coming to that same conclusion, but it's good to hear something definitive. This is, of course, only one of many reasons why Growl 1.3 should have been named Growl 2.0. : (
Thanks for the clear and concise response. /raj On Nov 10, 11:05 pm, Christopher Forsythe <[email protected]> wrote: > growlnotify for 1.2 can't talk to 1.3, and vice versa. > > You could use a gntp library (there's plenty, pick a langauge) to send a > notification to Growl > 1.3.http://growl.info/documentation/developer/bindings.phphas more information > on that. > > Chris > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:44 PM, raj <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have an older Mac which can't run Growl 1.3.1 but has an > > installation of Growl 1.2. Can the "growlnotify" associated with > > Growl 1.2 actually send messages to a Growl 1.3 system? When I try > > it, I get: > > > 2011-11-09 17:43:35.905 growlnotify[44968:903] Exception: > > NSPortTimeoutException > > Segmentation fault > > > If the 1.2 version of growlnotify is capable of sending message which > > can be correctly received by Growl 1.3, I'd like instructions on how > > to do it. > > > Thanks. > > > /raj > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Growl Discuss" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
