Both TCP-based LB and HTTP/2-based LB (with HTTP/2 to the backend) work as expected. TCP-based does not work as well with HTTP/2 because the connections last longer than HTTP/1, but it does function.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 6:01 PM, <jdover...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the past I've used haproxy to load balance all sorts of things. > > I would imagine a TCP based load balancing would be sufficient to ensure > high availability. > > Has anyone tried this or has any advice on this matter? > > TIA > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups " > grpc.io" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to grpc-io+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to grpc-io@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/grpc-io/dcd3ca0f-3771-4521-bc44-99068086e848%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/dcd3ca0f-3771-4521-bc44-99068086e848%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "grpc.io" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to grpc-io+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to grpc-io@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/CA%2B4M1oN4LTT_6ANDeks5d-Qe4KZs66O3rTDKM__h%3DgAJSEpk0A%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
