The reason why the SO_REUSEADDR behavior is seen on OSX but not linux has 
to do with the binary packaging of gRPC Python.

gRPC Python binary packages for linux are built against a "manylinux" 
platform that aims to be compatible with most linux distributions.  As a 
result, it is compiled without SO_REUSEADDR support.

gRPC Python binary packages for OSX are compiled with SO_REUSEADDR support.

If you need SO_REUSEADDR support for gRPC Python on linux, you can build 
from source.  If you would like to disable the behavior on OSX, you can use 
the following server option:

grpc.server(thread_pool, options=(('grpc.so_reuseport', 0),))


On Saturday, October 7, 2017 at 5:13:43 AM UTC-7, Amit Saha wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 12:34:43 PM UTC+10, Amit Saha wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:32 PM Amit Saha <amits...@gmail.com 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 6:26 PM Amit Saha <amits...@gmail.com 
>>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 at 5:40 am, Ken Payson <kpa...@google.com 
>>>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Amit Saha <amits...@gmail.com 
>>>>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:02 AM Amit Saha <amits...@gmail.com 
>>>>>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 at 6:44 am, Ken Payson <kpa...@google.com 
>>>>>>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> gRPC Python sets the SO_REUSEADDR option on server sockets, which 
>>>>>>>> allows multiple servers to bind to the same port.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks. Is there any reason why this is set to be the default 
>>>>>>> behavior?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Searching around, I can see that this *may* be desired behavior and 
>>>>>> hence gRPC has made a pragmatic choice. However, it seems to be most 
>>>>>> useful 
>>>>>> in a scenario where an existing socket is in the TIME_WAIT state and we 
>>>>>> want a new server process to bind to the same addr/port. However, two 
>>>>>> questions: 
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. This is not the case here - both of my servers are in LISTEN
>>>>>>
>>>>> I think you are referring to the SO_REUSEPORT option.  The 
>>>>> SO_REUSEADDR is different, and is intended for having multiple processes 
>>>>> bind to the same port.  One advantage of this is that you can scale by 
>>>>> having multiple processes serving requests. 
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, but whatever I read seems to suggest the behavior you mention 
>>>> for SO_REUSEPORT and not SO_REUSEADDR. I will definitely look more, but if 
>>>> you have a handy reference you can share, that will be great.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I switched to Linux for my experiments this time. Let's consider the 
>>> server below:
>>>
>>> import socket
>>> import os
>>>
>>> def start_server():
>>>     sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
>>>     sock.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)
>>>     sock.bind(('localhost', 5555))
>>>     sock.listen(0)
>>>
>>>     while True:
>>>         connection, address = sock.accept()
>>>         buf = connection.recv(64)
>>>         if len(buf) > 0:
>>>            print os.getpid()
>>>
>>>
>>> if __name__ == '__main__':
>>>     start_server()
>>>
>>> Start the instance 1:
>>>
>>> $ lsof -i TCP:5555
>>> COMMAND   PID  USER   FD   TYPE   DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
>>> python  10973 asaha    3u  IPv4 11332922      0t0  TCP localhost:5555 
>>> (LISTEN)
>>>
>>>
>>> If I try to start a second instance of the server, I get:
>>>
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>   File "server.py", line 19, in <module>
>>>     start_server()
>>>   File "server.py", line 7, in start_server
>>>     sock.bind(('localhost', 5555))
>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 228, in meth
>>>     return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args)
>>> socket.error: [Errno 98] Address already in use
>>>
>>> Now if I change the server as follows to use SO_REUSEPORT:
>>>
>>> import socket
>>> import os
>>>
>>>
>>> def start_server():
>>>     sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
>>>     sock.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEPORT, 1)
>>>     sock.bind(('localhost', 5555))
>>>     sock.listen(0)
>>>
>>>     while True:
>>>         connection, address = sock.accept()
>>>         buf = connection.recv(64)
>>>         if len(buf) > 0:
>>>             print os.getpid()
>>>
>>>
>>> if __name__ == '__main__':
>>>     start_server()
>>>
>>>
>>> I can start two server processes and I see both instances serving client 
>>> requests. So that tells me that SO_REUSEADDR doesn't allow a seond process 
>>> to LISTEN when another already is.
>>>
>>> Now, let's get back to my original gRPC server. When I try to start a 
>>> second instance of the server, I get this on Linux:
>>>
>>> E0907 12:28:57.205046525   16071 server_chttp2.c:53]         
>>> {"created":"@1504751337.205028841","description":"No address added out of 
>>> total 1 
>>> resolved","file":"src/core/ext/transport/chttp2/server/chttp2_server.c","file_line":260,"referenced_errors":[{"created":"@1504751337.205026361","description":"Unable
>>>  
>>> to configure 
>>> socket","fd":3,"file":"src/core/lib/iomgr/tcp_server_utils_posix_common.c","file_line":215,"referenced_errors":[{"created":"@1504751337.205023798","description":"OS
>>>  
>>> Error","errno":98,"file":"src/core/lib/iomgr/tcp_server_utils_posix_common.c","file_line":188,"os_error":"Address
>>>  
>>> already in use","syscall":"bind"}]}]}
>>>
>>> Much better, this exactly what I expected. So, this tells me that the 
>>> behaviour of SO_REUSEADDR is "different" on OS X?
>>>
>>
>> Only for gRPC's Python server i.e. (since I *did* get the error with my 
>> above serve file on OSX).
>>
>
> https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/12890 
>
>
>>  
>>
>>>
>>> FWIW, I found https://github.com/veithen/knetstat useful to be able to 
>>> see the socket options set.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"grpc.io" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to grpc-io+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to grpc-io@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/e27b3931-0661-4e96-9455-efe0b5a037f5%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to