Hi team, could you provide an estimate on when the official library might be ready for the release? Understanding the timeline would really help with our project planning.
Thanks, in advance! Djordje Milanovic понедељак, 22. април 2024. у 18:57:20 UTC+2 Doug Fawley је написао/ла: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 8:55 PM Daz Wilkin <daz.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm curious as to what it means for Google (gRPC team) to contribute (!?) >> to tonic and why this is necessary. >> > > gRPC is a CNCF <http://cncf.io> project > <https://www.cncf.io/projects/grpc/>. Google significantly funds it, but > it is OSS-first. Tonic is a different OSS project which is more > independent. The plan is to contribute a new channel and server > implementation into the tonic repo, utilizing tonic's "generic" gRPC > implementation, and also to move tonic to the gRPC organization on github > <https://github.com/grpc> (probably with the repo name "grpc-rust"). We > will be using the "grpc" crates.io name <https://crates.io/crates/grpc> which > the previous owner Stepan Koltsov <https://github.com/stepancheg> was > gracious enough to donate to the project as well. > > Presumably it results from Google's own increased adoption of Rust. >> Hopefully, it will lead to Google Cloud providing Cloud Client libraries in >> Rust too ;-) >> > > We certainly hope so too! :) > > >> Small gripe: that you are only soliciting adopters who are corporate >> developers (with a "company" and a "role/title") >> > > That was not our intent. Feel free to enter anything into these fields > that you feel is appropriate. (E.g. "independent" and "developer".) > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 2:59 PM Amelia <ame...@tortie.io> wrote: > >> I'm very excited for this! Is the idea to replace tonic? Fork it? Will >> you be working together with the protobuf team as they implement native >> rust support (https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/tree/main/rust)? >> Will the official gRPC implementation include support for common ecosystem >> packages like tower? > > > As mentioned above, the goal is ultimately to replace the channel and > server parts, since there are some API changes that will be needed in order > to bring in the complete gRPC feature set. We're still very early in > design, so it's unclear exactly how all of it will look. Using tower, > specifically, seems to involve some trade-offs and I'm not yet ready to > commit either way until I understand them more. > > Thanks, > Doug > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "grpc.io" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to grpc-io+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/b6f068f8-b4b4-4ed9-b301-3e7b3622f9acn%40googlegroups.com.
