Vincent Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: >> And they are still talking about LILO vs. GRUB? Completely off-topic. Who on >> the earth understands your post? *sigh* > > They are asking for a popularity poll between LILO and GRUB. > And they also report some problems they had with grub legacy : > -software raid (not straightforward with grub)
This can be easily implemented in GRUB 2 just like I implemented the "loopback" support. I did not know how software raid worked in GRUB Legacy (I did not know it had software raid support) and I do not know if this is the right way to implement it... > -"lilo -R"-like functionality (what's that ? an automatic fallback when > kernel can't be read ?) to make remote kernel changes safer. Something like this is possible with later (the latest?) GRUB Legacy release AFAIK/ > What comes up is also that most users just keep the default bootloader > from their distro. And grub seems to be the default bootloader in a > growing number of distributions. Right. I think it is our task to make GRUB 2 the default. :) -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
