On Aug 14, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:

On Monday 15 August 2005 00:27, Ruslan Nikolaev wrote:
Yesterday I sent patch for mmap support and x86_64 detection. What do you think about? I need to known about it becuase I'll be busy this week...

Ruslan, I would ask for a different function name. Initially I was very confused as to how/why GRUB was implementing mmap(2), but obviously that's not really what's going on. Perhaps "grub_multiboot_get_memmap" instead of "grub_multiboot_mmap"?

The detection code should not be a part of the kernel. You can do this only
protected mode, right?

(I guess you mean the grub "kern" directory. Calling it "kernel" is a little confusing because of course GRUB loads kernels...)

Why shouldn't it go there? Where should it go?

I prefer implementing this with inline assembly.

That's quite a lot of inline assembly... why not make it its own function?

-Hollis



_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to