On Monday 15 August 2005 09:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would agree with this. We should have a stable basis on which we can > improve grub2. There are so many improvments, e.g. vesafb module and > many others, and later a graphical menu, but we dont have a structure > for a menu entry (or a stable). Other modules/improvement uses this > basis and when this basis changes, parts of grub2/modules must be > rewritten to fit to the basis. We should create a list of improvments > (all the improvments which occurs in the list) and set priorities. We > should cralify which improvements apear in the next release and which > not, ...
Do not use "we should", when "we" do not include yourself. I do not like your idea. I have already said that we do not need branching at the moment. If you need stability, use GRUB Legacy. That's it. Okuji _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
