On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:29:41 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote > On Aug 11, 2005, at 4:44 AM, Vincent Guffens wrote: > > > The first reference I could find in the gcc doc about unnamed union > > was in 3.1.1, > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.1.1/gcc/Unnamed- > > Fields.html#Unnamed%20Fields > > > > If someone is however interrested, I have a version of grub (at least > > 6 months old) which compiles with 2.95. > > I can check this in, but it seems like it would be even better to > avoid unnamed unions. How big was the patch? I guess it was mostly > filesystem code? >
yes it was. In fact I realize that I sent the patch already to the list. The previous post is there : http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2005-03/msg00001.html Nothing was changed at that time. Maybe having the support for 2.95 isn't worth the change ? > -Hollis > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel -- Vincent Guffens UCL/CESAME +32 10 47 80 30 Euler Building A017 _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
