I agree wholeheartily with Jeroen's last paragraph below.

Some might even add that this should have been done sooner
.
As an observer I have not noticed any remarkable gain or needed
functionality added for quite some time.   Its been years and you
still don't have a production version..   And you should at least
attempt for the legacy features as a proof of stability and then later
you can add features as it matures.

Darel Henman

On 3/13/07, Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
..... snipped

Personally I think one of the important things we have to do is making
GRUB2 a suitable replacement for GRUB Legacy. This means implementing
all the features from GRUB Legacy that GRUB2 doesn't have yet, making
sure that the installer and other tools are all in a good state,
etc. It's a bit difficult to make a task out of that, but IMHO it's
time that GRUB2 gets ready for production use.

Jeroen Dekkers


_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to