On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:19:30PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > On Monday 07 May 2007 22:06, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 09:23:08PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > > > On Monday 07 May 2007 10:21, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > I think it would be reasonable to allow grub-probe to work without > > > > arguments. Any comments? > > > > > > Why do you think so? > > > > Because it's commonly invoked while debugging. The uninitiated might have > > some trouble figuring out the right parameter (specialy if they're not > > debugging themselves, but providing information for someone else to debug > > e.g. via BTS). > > The right parameter depends on system status. For instance, if you are trying > to install GRUB from an installer, and a boot partition is mounted at > somewhere else (e.g. /mnt/boot), it won't work correctly, anyway. I prefer > that grub-probe gets an argument explicitly, so that the user can at least > understand that grub-probe probes a certain directory.
Ah, ok. I understand. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
