Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 04:52:34PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: >> Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 02:57:30PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: >> >> Something I think is important for GRUB 2 is regression testing. So >> >> we can make sure things like scripting works, filesystems work >> >> correctly, etc. >> > >> > I can't agree more. I think major bug should be fixed as soon as possible, >> > otherwise grub2 wouldn't be that useful. >> >> BTW, did you notice any major bugs? Please document them on the >> wiki. It's not ideal for this, but it is at least something. > > I didn't find any major bug, just a few minor ones. For example, the > blocklist command seems to generate messy result when compared to GRUB > Legacy. > > btw, I think the wiki is not very convenient, something like a forum would > be much better.
Well, that's what a mailinglist is for. The best thing, according to most people working on GRUB (from what I can tell) is a bug tracking system combined with something that tracks tasks, what people are interested on, descriptions of how tasks should be performed, etc. That is something I like as well. -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
