On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 09:06:49PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:40:15PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > > > > So what do you think? > > As said in my other mails in this thread, I don't think it makes sense to > switch to GPLv3 unless we do it all the way, including GRUB Legacy. > > (and I'm all for switching rather than staying with GPLv2)
Oh, I'm sorry. I missed the part of your mail that mentions GRUB Legacy cannot easily migrate to GPLv3 because it uses GPLv2-only code. In that case, I suggest we keep GRUB Legacy under GPLv2, but also make the promise that GPLv3 code from GRUB 2 won't be relicensed to GPLv2 for use in GRUB Legacy, because that makes GPLv3 useless. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
