"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 24 January 2008 19:34, Pavel Roskin wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 20:08 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: >> > Previous behavior was working correctly. You have to handle >> > errorcodes >> > at some point and that means when error is handled it is zeroed (or >> > GRUB_ERR_NONE). So code is in callee where that loop was. >> >> I suggest that we never set grub_errno to 0 (except the initialization). >> That would match the standard errno behavior: >> >> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/errno.html > > Marco is right. As you pointed out, our error handling is different from > errno > on Unix, but this is intentional, because I stole the model from GRUB Legacy > and Parted.
It's nice when people say I am right (it should happen more often). But I do not recall participating in this thread. Did I miss something, like I usually do? ;-) -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
