On Feb 6, 2008 11:32 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 11:01:49PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> >
> > * loader/i386/pc/multiboot.c (grub_multiboot_load_elf32): Get physical
> > address of entry.
> > (grub_multiboot_load_elf64): Likewise.
> > (grub_multiboot): Initialize mbi structure.
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/loader/i386/pc/multiboot.c b/loader/i386/pc/multiboot.c
> > index fa6346e..2fd2b24 100644
> > --- a/loader/i386/pc/multiboot.c
> > +++ b/loader/i386/pc/multiboot.c
> > @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ grub_multiboot_load_elf32 (grub_file_t file, void *buffer)
> > {
> > Elf32_Ehdr *ehdr = (Elf32_Ehdr *) buffer;
> > Elf32_Phdr *phdr;
> > + grub_addr_t real_entry = 0;
>
> I would suggest a more explicit name, like physical_entry_addr or so. That'd
> make it easier to understand without the context of your mail and changelog
> entry.
>
> > + grub_memset (mbi, 0, sizeof (struct grub_multiboot_info));
>
> I wonder if it'd make sense to do this in grub_malloc(). This would save us
> from similar bugs in the future (and have the advantage that memory handling
> bugs would be exposed earlier). What do you think, is this idea too crazy?
> :-)
>
> (I would still add grub_memset here for now, though; makes no sense to delay
> it)
thanks for your advise, fix and committed.
--
Bean
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
