On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 20:52 -0600, Julian Salazar wrote: > Sorry if I wasn't more specific, but I was talking about the multiboot draft > at http://grub.enbug.org/MultibootDraft, specifically the Multiboot > Information Format.
Oh, I see. It seems to me that the code implements a more thought out standard. 0 is MULTIBOOT2_TAG_RESERVED1 there. The code was committed by Jerone Young, but I don't know who maintains the specification. It's quite possible that the code has never been tested on a real kernel. > > Or maybe you mean that the kernel should tell the bootloader whether the > > control should be passed to it in the 64-bit mode? > > Exactly what I mean - maybe there should a flag of some kind, or a > parameter... I see. Anyway, I don't feel qualified about discussing the proposed standard. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
