Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > Stefan Reinauer wrote: >> Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: >>> Idea of the rescue shell is load other modules in case grub itself >>> cannot find them. It provides thin layer of tools so user is able to >>> find them. >>> >>> Personally I would like to keep this functionality in core.img. >> So, how is the "rescue shell" different that "grub itself". Why would it >> find modules that "grub itself" does not find? > > User can use ls and insmod commands to load those modules from disk. > Most common problem with GRUB legacy is that it just prints GRUB on > screen. This will kinda remove that problem as user still has a way to > boot his system with some keypresses. So the rescue shell has filesystems and a shell? Is the "advanced console interface" so huge that it can't live with the shell and the filesystems in the rescue shell?
-- coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br. Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] • http://www.coresystems.de/ Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656 Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866 _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel