Hi, Marco and I had an interesting discussion about bug-grub today:
15:54 < marco_g> nyu: Actually, I rarely look at the BTS 15:54 < marco_g> The list is a better way to process patches, IMO. 15:55 < nyu> marco_g: bug-grub is rotting 15:55 < nyu> we should really consider a list merge 15:55 < marco_g> nyu: What do you mean? 15:55 < nyu> either that, or get rid of the BTS and bug-grub 15:55 < marco_g> nyu: I do not oppose to the latter ;-) 15:55 < nyu> marco_g: a BTS *is* useful 15:56 < marco_g> nyu: I do not see any email when people post bugs for GRUB 2, is there a way to subscribe? 15:56 < marco_g> That would make it more useful to me... 15:57 < nyu> marco_g: they go to bug-grub 15:57 < marco_g> Oh, I don't read bug-grub 15:57 < marco_g> It's for GRUB Legacy as I see it. 15:59 < nyu> marco_g: then let's dislodge GRUB Legacy from it 16:00 < marco_g> nyu: Good idea, please propose it ;-) So this is my lazy way of I'm proposing that :-) What does everyone think? -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What good is a phone call… if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
