El lun, 21-07-2008 a las 13:03 -0400, Pavel Roskin escribió: > On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 18:50 +0200, Javier Martín wrote: > > > Of course, another way to go could be to allow the bootloader part of > > GRUB to be built in PE format: it would "just" be a matter of writing > > the PE counterparts to kern/elf.c and abstracting kern/dl.c "a > > bit" (i.e. a lot of work). The downside to this, apart from the > > unspecified work required, is that Windows-built i386-pc-pe modules are > > no longer compatible with Linux-built i386-pc-elf. Not a showstopper, > > but might require a sober thinking. As I have a lot of free time right > > now, I'll try to think whether it's possible or not. > > I think it's important to have a consistent format for modules. I thought that two hours ago, but now I find no advantage other than the sharing of modules between similar computers.
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
