On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:49:46PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 09:58 +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > > > > I tried moving more stuff to common.rmk many times but gave up every > > > time. One of the reasons is that the sparc64 support is very > > > out-of-date and doesn't use common.rmk at all. I cannot even test it > > > (well, I haven't tries hard). > > > > If sparc64 support is out of date and the maintainer is nowhere to be > > seen then I think you can put that support to graveyard until someone > > comes up to update it. Putting all common stuff to every platform to > > common.rmk is a good way and the only way (in my opinion) to go forward. > > OK, then there is an issue that it doesn't work if done naively.
What is the problem exactly? -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
