Felix Zielcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Dienstag, den 12.08.2008, 18:28 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
>
> Ok naming the old patch kern_err.diff and the new one raid_err.diff
> isn't a good idea :(
>
>
> 2008-08-12 Felix Zielcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * kern/err.c [GRUB_UTIL]: Include <stdio.h>.
Please don't do this. Why do you want this?
> [GRUB_UTIL] (grub_print_error): Use fprintf (stderr, ...) instead
> of
> grub_printf.
Why?
It would be better to make a util/misc.c:grub_print_error instead of this
> * disk/raid.c (GRUB_MOD_INIT): Use grub_print_error() to show RAID
> errors and reset grub_errno. Do not give errors to the upper layer.
"...reset grub_errno. Do not..."
(double space)
> Index: disk/raid.c
> ===================================================================
> --- disk/raid.c (revision 1800)
> +++ disk/raid.c (working copy)
> @@ -581,6 +581,8 @@
> {
Please use -up for diff, you can use:
$ svn diff --diff-cmd diff -x -up
> grub_device_iterate (&grub_raid_scan_device);
> grub_disk_dev_register (&grub_raid_dev);
> + grub_print_error ();
> + grub_errno = GRUB_ERR_NONE;
> }
>
> GRUB_MOD_FINI(raid)
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
