On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 05:05:26PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> + unsigned char i, j, k, l;
I think using unsigned chars to store "integers" is counter-intuitive, and in
some cases possibly dangerous (overflow).
> + grub_dev = xmalloc (strlen (os_dev) - strlen ("/dev/mapper/") + 1);
> +
> + j = sizeof ("/dev/mapper/") -1;
^
Missing space here :-)
> + for (i = 0, k = 0; i < l; i++)
> + {
> + grub_dev[k] = os_dev[j + i];
> + k++;
i already counts from 0 and increments by-one. Can it be used instead of k?
The rest of the code I mostly don't understand well. If you feel confident
that it's right, I suggest you check it in unless someone else also wants to
review it.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
