On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 09:10:15PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Robert Millan <r...@aybabtu.com> [2009.02.21.2049 +0100]: > > Martin, our problem is that "single-user mode" is very confusing for those > > not experienced with Un*x. They tend to think this is the normal mode of > > operation since they are (usually) a "single user". > > > > Any comments? > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=370110 > > It was purely aesthetic for me. I would not oppose a change back for > the purpose of increasing clarity for others. I suppose > a configuration option might be possible, but even that could be > considered overkill by the person who has to implement it, and > I wouldn't blame him/her. :) > > Thanks for asking. No opposition from me.
Okay thanks for the quick reply. If nobody has a better idea, I'll just set it to "recovery mode". -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
