2009/8/20 Michael Gorven <mich...@gorven.za.net>:
> On Thursday 20 August 2009 09:49:06 Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> 2009/8/20 Michael Gorven <mich...@gorven.za.net>:
>> > On Wednesday 19 August 2009 21:21:28 Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> >> Tell me one technical benefit of TPM over coreboot.
>> >
>> > Coreboot doesn't provide protected storage of secrets (e.g. harddrive
>> > decryption keys).
>>
>> TPM does not either at the time the BIOS is loaded. Remember, it's the
>> CPU what's running the BIOS, not the TPM chip.
>>
>> Only after BIOS enables TPM or coreboot enables any crypto device you
>> choose you get any secrets or keys.
>
> So? It's still protected storage. You can read a BIOS chip, but you can't just
> read the contents of a TPM chip.
>

You can use decent crypto storage rather than half-broken TPM. There
is no advantage to using it.

Thanks

Michal


_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to