On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Robert Millan<r...@aybabtu.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:46:29AM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> Why is it still asm? It can be done easily in C. >> Actually here we have 2 extremes: nice code (C, transform to nice >> flags (only one shift or 2 conrols and alts)) or small code (asm, >> crude value). Where we choose the compromise is a question for >> maintainer, not me. > > Nice code, please. We're pressed for space, but not *that* much. > > Besides, we can't use this asm code as-is, unless we get word from the > people who wrote it (Colin wrote most of the patch, but not this). > In this case we don't need asm at all. > -- > Robert Millan > > The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and > how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we > still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >
-- Regards Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
