Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2009, 19:21 +0100 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > Am Montag, den 10.08.2009, 17:28 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 03:25:26PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > > Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 18:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:45:35AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote: > > > > > > Felix Zielcke escribió: > > > > > > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed. > > > > > > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which > > > > > > > hopefully > > > > > > > comes before December) > > > > > > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December. > > > > > > > > > > I don't see anything wrong with being "under development". I hope > > > > > that > > > > > GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97. I don't see how > > > > > Debian can have any problem with that. > > > > > > > > It depends. If we say GRUB 2 is "under development" but we don't say > > > > anything > > > > about GRUB Legacy, people might think GRUB 2 is not ready.
Oh I even forgot that there was in the meanwhile even someone in #grub who was a bit scared of GRUB 2 because of this sentence. But luckly not that scared to not ask how stable it is now. -- Felix Zielcke Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
