Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 01:10:11PM +0000, rubisher wrote:
But as far as the 1st parameter of grub_vsprintf is a pointer,
wouldn't it be better to write:
--- kern/misc.c.orig 2009-11-22 13:07:22.000000000 +0000
+++ kern/misc.c 2009-11-22 13:07:51.000000000 +0000
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
{
int ret;
- ret = grub_vsprintf (0, fmt, args);
+ ret = grub_vsprintf (NULL, fmt, args);
return ret;
}
Yes. But we have many of those, so we don't go huntin' them. If you'd
like to help us, a patch that does this change in bulk would be welcome.
Thanks
It will be of great pleasure for me, but I didn't foreseen so much (the most difficult to me are 'opaque pointer') but I
hoppe that such 'sparse' would help me for the most ;<)
Hope to comeback soon,
J.
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel