2009/11/29 Qianqian Fang <fan...@gmail.com>: > Michal Suchanek wrote: >> >> It's good enough to read the character but if I designed a theme with >> this character in some large caption I would immediately start looking >> for a font that has a decent glyph for this character. It's far from >> nice to look at. >> > > I was talking about "rasterization quality", do you mean > the aesthetics of the glyph topology/structure?
Aestetics is relative but uniform stroke width is not. > > However, I am pretty sure you don't need to worry about > "灱" because it is an extremely rarely used character and > was only used in ancient literatures. As a matter of fact, > in the over 20,000 Han char. included in the fonts I mentioned, > the top 3,000~4,000 covers 99.6% of the use in modern Chinese [1]. > Yes, I suspected it would not be a common character, my character table does not list a meaning for it. However, similar issue can be seen with the 刀 character in the microhei_24px and microhei_32px rasterization. In fact, the stroke width is almost inverted in these two rasterizations although they are supposedly the same font. Thanks Michal _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
