On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Isaac Dupree
<m...@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>>>
>>> In this case color_info is defined as following:
>>
>> I'd appreciate if a native English speaker confirms this, but I believe
>> this should say "as follows" (same for the other instances of this
>> construct).
>
> "as follows" reads naturally to me, as a native speaker (also checked:
> online dictionaries mention the phrase "as follows" without saying it's
> specific to my area -- northeast U.S. -- so I think it's right to use)
+1 for as follows
>
>>> +...@samp{framebuffer_palette_addr} contains address of array of
>>> @samp{framebuffer_palette_num_colors} following structures:
>>
>> There seems to be some word missing here.
>
> "the following structures"?
> "as follows" would also work well if "structures" isn't an important word to
> keep?
> wait, it's like saying "array of 3 following structures", each of the same
> type. hmm. "@samp{framebuffer_palette_num_colors} structures as follows"?
How about this?
XYZZY contains _the_ address of _an_ array of N structures which follow
>
> -Isaac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
