-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2012 9:58 PM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > There are multiple reports of GRUB2 refusing to install on disk > which was used for LDM in the past. Example is: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1061255 > > I tested behavior of Windows and Linux on a disk with valid LDM > signature but manually modified partition table. Both ignore LDM > labels if disk does not contain SFS partition (0x42) and treat is > as pure MBR disk. This differs from GRUB2 behavior which always > checks for LDM label whether SFS partition exists or not. > > Would the following be appropriate? It adds additional check for > partition 0x42 before checking for LDM labels.
Looks nice to me. The kernel has this requirement so grub should as well. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQrUZhAAoJEJrBOlT6nu759uEH/RuU97hAKP2GcAHTkKjvcZqg Jih1USVExNW/CYzXglXXg8KjYOv7J5xQsj00KZ8LW8f0X+ns76kV1NsrraeJFETI repkr9FX55+qvUYzbl7PiykoWnC3RUp+TUzZYotZcfc0j1YraDzhAtNsZmDPfvwq n9Ljo0py/HBPrWU6rjE31voVA8tkYOUz6ztldghDT3x+OJI7w5KnXJgXEOYxqVoJ Sx9dHsCd/AKO68CwCjVuRHUeQQV1EIlVDKX0ZG21ZM2q79YEJnIChXVSvxbaySRD yB6W9BNg7hOtFPkJs9pr81qWu3YE9RwyreOLfgGR4qzPpMBQkGsdEMJqlQytq4k= =2Eyx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
