On 06/24/2013 06:27 AM, Mikko Rantalainen wrote: > I'd suggest trying to apply the workflow used by git development for > grub, too.
While i don't expect my opinion to have any particular weight (i'm mostly a bug reporter and tester in this community) i would also be happy to see a switch from bzr to git if the upstream devs are OK with it. > Make sure to have a mirror at github.com and if you don't want to use > github's issue tracker, put a big disclaimer about that in github. As > far as I know, you cannot disable public issue tracker in github > repository's settings. I have to disagree with the above. Maintaining a mirror at github.com is not at all a requirement, and the maintenance of such a mirror is extra work (however small). The extra mirror can potentially create confusion if it isn't properly maintained, as can the github issue tracker if it isn't the canonical issue tracker. If you consider switching to git, please don't spend any extra cycles worrying about github.com integration unless you have a compelling reason to do so. --dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel