On 23.12.2013 05:45, Chris Murphy wrote: > As for grub's part in the solution, it seems like it would need to understand > absolute paths to subvol 5, as well as relative paths to the default subvol > (set with the 'btrfs subvol set-default' command). It doesn't seem to me at all that "relative" paths is a necessity and you don't provide a usecase
> I think syntax wise it's simplest to use / for absolute and no-/ for relative > to default. What do you think? > > I still don't think it needs syntax of subvolids. > > >> > except it is >> > not that straightforward in current btrfs because path names are >> > resolved relative to current root :) > Navigation of a currently mounted subvolume, yes, I can only navigate below > that point. It's no different than being in chroot, or mounting a partition > and being unable to navigate into other partitions. This analogies all share a common crucial point: GRUB neither supports nor needs any of them.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel