В Sun, 08 Feb 2015 11:14:28 -0600 Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> пишет:
> Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > В Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:55:54 +0000 Eric Ewanco <eric.ewa...@genband.com> > > пишет: > > > >> > >> Background: I need to use a really large initrd for x86_64 (Linux 3.4.47), > >> and I'm near the limit, so I'm studying grub-core/loader/i386/linux.c to > >> find out the whys and wherefores of the GRUB 2.00 size limit. > > > > GRUB 2.00 is way too old. > > But as far as I know grub-2.00 is the last "stable" release. There is the > more > current grub-2.02~beta2 that was released over a year ago, but some people > prefer releases that upstream has designated as stable. > If you want to discuss a problem on development list, you should at least verify if this problem exists in current code. In practice all ditros I'm aware of are using at least 2.02~beta2 or what effectively amounts to git snapshot. > Has grub gone to a policy of git snapshots only and forgone stable releases? > I do not think it is intentional. _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
