Le Fri, Jun 3, 2016 à 3:03 PM, Alan Perry <[email protected]> a écrit :
> I think that I recognize this issue. There is a direct call into a > driver to get the device handle. If you want to substitute that driver, > then the substitute driver needs to have that same global function. > > There should be a better way to get that device handle than calling > directly into the driver. > Please provide more details. Device handle is something opaque on purpose and is only exposed in very limited manner. Which function do you have in mind? > > alan > > On 6/2/16 12:17 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > > > No. And you shouldn't have the 2 different global functions named. Why > > can't you just rename one of the functions? > > > > > > Le jeu. 2 juin 2016 21:16, Mat Troi <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > If there are two modules that have the same function names. Is > > there a way to force a 3rd module to pick up the right dependency? > > > > For example: > > Mod A and mod B both contain function_foo > > > > Mod C uses function_foo. > > > > Right now, mod C is using function_foo in mod B, is there a way I > > can force mod C to use function_foo in mod A? > > > > Thanks, > > Mat Troi > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
