On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 02:03:52PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 02:11:59PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 09:26:48PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > > +{
> > > + grub_efi_boot_services_t *b;
> > > + struct efi_allocation *alloc;
> > > + grub_efi_status_t status;
> > > +
> > > + b = grub_efi_system_table->boot_services;
> > > + status = efi_call_3 (b->allocate_pool, GRUB_EFI_LOADER_DATA,
> > > + sizeof(*alloc), (void**)&alloc);
> > > + if (status == GRUB_EFI_SUCCESS)
> > > + {
> > > + alloc->next = efi_allocated_memory;
> > > + alloc->start_addr = address;
> > > + alloc->pages = pages;
> > > + efi_allocated_memory = alloc;
> > > + }
> > > + else
> > > + grub_printf ("Could not malloc memory to remember EFI allocation. "
> > > + "Exiting grub2 won't free all memory.\n");
> >
> > s/grub2/GRUB2/
>
> Well, GRUB. Grub2 is a distro-ism.
> We shouldn't have to update individual message strings when we bump
> revisions.
I am OK with GRUB too.
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
