On 21.02.19 16:16, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:38:09AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> Am 20.02.2019 um 21:46 schrieb Daniel Kiper <dki...@net-space.pl>:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 04:34:08PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>> There is a really convenient service for open source project from Travis
>>>> CI: They allow for free CI testing using their infrastructure.
>>>>
>>>> Grub has had issues with broken builds for various targets for a long time
>>>> already. The main reason is a lack of CI to just do smoke tests on whether
>>>> all targets still at least compile.
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds a travis config file which builds (almost) all currently
>>>> available targets.
>>>>
>>>> On top of that, this travis config also runs a small execution test on the
>>>> x86_64-efi target.
>>>>
>>>> All of this config file can easily be extended further on. It probably
>>>> makes
>>>> sense to do something similar to the u-boot test infrastructure that
>>>> communicates with the payload properly. Going forward, we also will want to
>>>> do more qemu runtime checks for other targets.
>>>>
>>>> Currently, with this config alone, I already see about half of the
>>>> available
>>>> targets as broken. So it's definitely desperately needed :).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>>
>>>> - Fix comment about toolchain variable
>>>>
>>>> v2 -> v3:
>>>>
>>>> - s/grub/GRUB/
>>>> - remove unneeded packages
>>>> - comment fixes
>>>> - determine number of jobs dynamically
>>>> - sort targets alphabetically
>>>> ---
>>>> .travis.yml | 117
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 .travis.yml
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000..9a6f58ff6
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/.travis.yml
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0+
>>>> +# Originally Copyright Roger Meier <r.me...@siemens.com>
>>>> +# Adapted for GRUB by Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
>>>> +
>>>> +# build GRUB on Travis CI - https://travis-ci.org/
>>>> +
>>>> +dist: xenial
>>>> +
>>>> +language: c
>>>> +
>>>> +addons:
>>>> + apt:
>>>> + packages:
>>>> + - cppcheck
>>>> + - bc
>>>> + - build-essential
>>>> + - libsdl1.2-dev
>>>> + - python
>>>> + - python-virtualenv
>>>> + - swig
>>>> + - libpython-dev
>>>> + - wget
>>>> + - device-tree-compiler
>>>> + - lzop
>>>> + - liblz4-tool
>>>> + - libisl15
>>>> + - qemu-system
>>>> + - ovmf
>>>> + - unifont
>>>
>>> Still have an itching to ask you to trim it down... Just build one
>>> target to reduce your wait time to minimum. If everything works
>>> then re-enable all of them.
>>
>> Why? Installing the packages takes a few seconds of ghe build time at
>
> It is confusing at least. INSTALL file does not require all of them. And
> a few seconds multiplied by thousands times gives you a few thousands of
> seconds lost from your/our lives...
>
>> most. Also, I don't see anything obviously superfluous.
>
>>>> + - cppcheck
>>>> + - bc
>
> Both are not needed.
>
>>>> + - build-essential
>
> Only needed if you plan to build Debian packages.
> So, not needed.
>
>>>> + - libsdl1.2-dev
>>>> + - python
>
> OK.
>
>>>> + - python-virtualenv
>>>> + - swig
>>>> + - libpython-dev
>
> All that stuff is not needed.
>
>>>> + - wget
>
> Is not it provided with default distro?
It is indeed.
>
>>>> + - device-tree-compiler
>
> Not needed.
>
>>>> + - lzop
>
> OK.
>
>>>> + - liblz4-tool
>>>> + - libisl15
>
> Not needed.
>
>>>> + - qemu-system
>>>> + - ovmf
>
> OK.
>
>>>> + - unifont
>
> In real you need ttf-unifont but I can live with unifont too.
>
> And of course I would sort the list of packages alphabetically...
>
> Yeah, I am boring, I know... :-)))
>
>>>> +env:
>>>> + global:
>>>> + # Include all cross toolchain paths, so we can just call them later
>>>> down
>>>> + -
>>>> PATH=/tmp/qemu-install/bin:/tmp/grub/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/tmp/cross/gcc-8.1.0-nolibc/aarch64-linux/bin:/tmp/cross/gcc-8.1.0-nolibc/arm-linux-gnueabi/bin:/tmp/cross/gcc-8.1.0-nolibc/ia64-linux/bin:/tmp/cross/gcc-8.1.0-nolibc/mips64-linux/bin:/tmp/cross/gcc-8.1.0-nolibc/powerpc64-linux/bin:/tmp/cross/gcc-8.1.0-nolibc/riscv32-linux/bin:/tmp/cross/gcc-8.1.0-nolibc/riscv64-linux/bin:/tmp/cross/gcc-8.1.0-nolibc/sparc64-linux/bin
>>>
>>> Should not you put /usr/bin:/bin at the end of the PATH? Or even
>>> /tmp/qemu-install/bin:/tmp/grub/bin:/usr/bin:/bin? Otherwise you
>>> may use during build not these tools which you expect.
>>
>
>> The cross tools only install prefixed binaries (aarch64-linux-gcc) -
>> and even if something unprefixed did sneak in, we really only ever
>> want to use the prefixed ones :). So the end of PATH is definitely
>> correct.
>
> Prefixed versions can also be installed in the system. And you do not
> have full control on the system. So, I would move all stuff mentioned
> above to the end of the PATH. However, I am not going to insist much
> here.
That's not quite true - we *do* have full control of the system. Travis
takes exactly the "travis xenial" docker image and then runs scripts
that install exatly the packages we list.
So I don't think we need to be scared of cross compilers in the path.
Alex
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
