On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:33:45 +0200 Patrick Steinhardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 07:30:00AM +0200, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli > wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 18:18:01 +0200 > > Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > The patches Subject ends up like that because I forgot the PATCH in > > git format-patch --subject-prefix: > > > Subject: [v5][ 1/6] cryptodisk: luks: unify grub_cryptodisk_dev > > > function names > > > > Do I have to do something about it? Or should I instead leave it > > like that and hope that people don't filter it out because they > > don't contain [PATCH]. > > Instead of manually adjusting the prefix, you can just say `git > format-patch -v5` to set the patch set's version. I noticed that > earlier but forgot to point this out to you. Thanks a lot. I'll try it next time as something like that is way more convenient. It also makes it look always the same instead of having many variations between things like [PATCH v1][1/3], [Patch v1][1/3], [Patch][v1 1/3], etc and gets rid of the many half-messed up subject prefixes. Denis.
pgpvw5G5lL5ij.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
