On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 13:34:44 +0100 Daniel Kiper <dki...@net-space.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 07:57:11PM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote: > > If there is a loopback device with the same name as the one to be > > created, instead of closing the old one and replacing it with the > > new one, return an error instead. If the loopback device was > > created, its probably being used by something and just replacing it > > may cause grub to crash unexpectedly. This fixes obvious problems > > like `loopback d (d)/somefile'. Its not too onerous to force the > > user to delete the loopback first with the `-d' switch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Glenn Washburn <developm...@efficientek.com> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.ki...@oracle.com> > > Daniel > > PS May I ask you to create new thread for new version of the patches > instead of attaching them to previous threads? These two patches were not meant to be a thread together, ie separate patches, which was why I was treating them separately. I can see how that might be confusing now. Glenn _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
