I will make the requested changes tonight in a v5.

Just so I understand, is there some coding standard for preferring ternary
operators and comparing bools to true?

Thanks,
Andrew

On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 10:06 AM Daniel Kiper <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 10:17:37PM -0500, Andrew Hamilton wrote:
> > Support dates outside of 1901..2038.
> >
> > Fixes: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63894
> > Fixes: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66301
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Hamilton <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  grub-core/lib/datetime.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  include/grub/datetime.h  | 27 ++++++++++++-----
> >  2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/grub-core/lib/datetime.c b/grub-core/lib/datetime.c
> > index 8f0922fb0..a0f84d989 100644
> > --- a/grub-core/lib/datetime.c
> > +++ b/grub-core/lib/datetime.c
> > @@ -64,7 +64,10 @@ grub_get_weekday_name (struct grub_datetime *datetime)
> >  #define SECPERDAY (24*SECPERHOUR)
> >  #define DAYSPERYEAR 365
> >  #define DAYSPER4YEARS (4*DAYSPERYEAR+1)
> > -
> > +/* 24 leap years in 100 years */
> > +#define DAYSPER100YEARS (100 * DAYSPERYEAR + 24)
> > +/* 97 leap years in 400 years */
> > +#define DAYSPER400YEARS (400 * DAYSPERYEAR + 97)
> >
> >  void
> >  grub_unixtime2datetime (grub_int64_t nix, struct grub_datetime
> *datetime)
> > @@ -76,10 +79,12 @@ grub_unixtime2datetime (grub_int64_t nix, struct
> grub_datetime *datetime)
> >    /* Convenience: let's have 3 consecutive non-bissextile years
> >       at the beginning of the counting date. So count from 1901. */
> >    int days_epoch;
> > -  /* Number of days since 1st Januar, 1901.  */
> > +  /* Number of days since 1st January, 1 (proleptic). */
> >    unsigned days;
> >    /* Seconds into current day.  */
> >    unsigned secs_in_day;
> > +  /* Tracks whether this is a leap year. */
> > +  bool is_bisextile;
> >
> >    /* Transform C divisions and modulos to mathematical ones */
> >    if (nix < 0)
> > @@ -92,27 +97,62 @@ grub_unixtime2datetime (grub_int64_t nix, struct
> grub_datetime *datetime)
> >      days_epoch = grub_divmod64 (nix, SECPERDAY, NULL);
> >
> >    secs_in_day = nix - days_epoch * SECPERDAY;
> > -  days = days_epoch + 69 * DAYSPERYEAR + 17;
> > +  /*
> > +   * 1970 is Unix Epoch. Adjust to a year 1 epoch:
> > +   *  Leap year logic:
> > +   *   - Years evenly divisible by 400 are leap years
> > +   *   - Otherwise, if divisible by 100 are not leap years
> > +   *   - Otherwise, if divisible by 4 are leap years
> > +   *  There are four 400-year periods (1600 years worth of days with
> leap days)
> > +   *  There are three 100-year periods worth of leap days (3*24)
> > +   *  There are 369 years in addition to the four 400 year periods
> > +   *  There are 17 leap days in 69 years (beyond the three 100 year
> periods)
> > +   */
> > +  days = days_epoch + 369 * DAYSPERYEAR + 17 + 24 * 3 + 4 *
> DAYSPER400YEARS;
> > +
> > +  datetime->year = 1 + 400 * (days / DAYSPER400YEARS);
> > +  days %= DAYSPER400YEARS;
> >
> > -  datetime->year = 1901 + 4 * (days / DAYSPER4YEARS);
> > +  /*
> > +   * On 31st December of bissextile (leap) years 365 days from the
> beginning
> > +   * of the year elapsed but year isn't finished yet - every 400 years
> > +   * 396 is 4 years less than 400 year leap cycle
> > +   * 96 is 1 day less than number of leap days in 400 years
> > +   */
> > +  if (days / DAYSPER100YEARS == 4)
> > +    {
> > +      datetime->year += 396;
> > +      days -= 396 * DAYSPERYEAR + 96;
> > +    }
> > +  else
> > +    {
> > +      datetime->year += 100 * (days / DAYSPER100YEARS);
> > +      days %= DAYSPER100YEARS;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +  datetime->year += 4 * (days / DAYSPER4YEARS);
> >    days %= DAYSPER4YEARS;
> > -  /* On 31st December of bissextile years 365 days from the beginning
> > -     of the year elapsed but year isn't finished yet */
> > +  /*
> > +   * On 31st December of bissextile (leap) years 365 days from the
> beginning
> > +   * of the year elapsed but year isn't finished yet - every 4 years
> > +   */
> >    if (days / DAYSPERYEAR == 4)
> >      {
> >        datetime->year += 3;
> > -      days -= 3*DAYSPERYEAR;
> > +      days -= 3 * DAYSPERYEAR;
> >      }
> >    else
> >      {
> >        datetime->year += days / DAYSPERYEAR;
> >        days %= DAYSPERYEAR;
> >      }
> > -  for (i = 0; i < 12
> > -      && days >= (i==1 && datetime->year % 4 == 0
> > -                   ? 29 : months[i]); i++)
> > -    days -= (i==1 && datetime->year % 4 == 0
> > -                         ? 29 : months[i]);
> > +
> > +  is_bisextile = datetime->year % 4 == 0
> > +                 && (datetime->year % 100 != 0 || datetime->year % 400
> == 0);
>
> Even if it works it is not fully correct...
>
> is_bisextile = (datetime->year % 4 == 0 &&
>                 (datetime->year % 100 != 0 || datetime->year % 400 == 0))
> ? true : false;
>
> > +  for (i = 0;
> > +       i < 12 && days >= ((i == 1 && is_bisextile == true) ? 29 :
> months[i]);
> > +       i++)
> > +    days -= ((i == 1 && is_bisextile == true) ? 29 : months[i]);
> >    datetime->month = i + 1;
> >    datetime->day = 1 + days;
> >    datetime->hour = (secs_in_day / SECPERHOUR);
> > diff --git a/include/grub/datetime.h b/include/grub/datetime.h
> > index bcec636f0..ff847e847 100644
> > --- a/include/grub/datetime.h
> > +++ b/include/grub/datetime.h
> > @@ -54,8 +54,9 @@ void grub_unixtime2datetime (grub_int64_t nix,
> >  static inline int
> >  grub_datetime2unixtime (const struct grub_datetime *datetime,
> grub_int64_t *nix)
> >  {
> > -  grub_int32_t ret;
> > +  grub_int64_t ret;
> >    int y4, ay;
> > +  bool is_bisextile;
> >    const grub_uint16_t monthssum[12]
> >      = { 0,
> >       31,
> > @@ -75,15 +76,11 @@ grub_datetime2unixtime (const struct grub_datetime
> *datetime, grub_int64_t *nix)
> >    const int SECPERHOUR = 60 * SECPERMIN;
> >    const int SECPERDAY = 24 * SECPERHOUR;
> >    const int SECPERYEAR = 365 * SECPERDAY;
> > -  const int SECPER4YEARS = 4 * SECPERYEAR + SECPERDAY;
> > +  const grub_int64_t SECPER4YEARS = 4 * SECPERYEAR + SECPERDAY;
> >
> > -  if (datetime->year > 2038 || datetime->year < 1901)
> > -    return 0;
> >    if (datetime->month > 12 || datetime->month < 1)
> >      return 0;
> >
> > -  /* In the period of validity of unixtime all years divisible by 4
> > -     are bissextile*/
> >    /* Convenience: let's have 3 consecutive non-bissextile years
> >       at the beginning of the epoch. So count from 1973 instead of 1970
> */
> >    ret = 3 * SECPERYEAR + SECPERDAY;
> > @@ -94,13 +91,27 @@ grub_datetime2unixtime (const struct grub_datetime
> *datetime, grub_int64_t *nix)
> >    ret += y4 * SECPER4YEARS;
> >    ret += ay * SECPERYEAR;
> >
> > +  /*
> > +   * Correct above calculation (which assumes every 4 years is a leap
> year)
> > +   * to remove those "false leap years" that are divisible by 100 but
> not 400.
> > +   * Since this logic starts with seconds since 1973, 15 is used
> because:
> > +   *  - (1973 - 1) / 100 = 19 (floor due to integer math)
> > +   *  - (1973 - 1) / 400 = 4 (floor due to integer math)
> > +   *  - 19 - 4 - 15 = 0 (we want to start with no "false leap years" at
> time
> > +   *     zero of 1973)
> > +   */
> > +  ret -= ((datetime->year - 1) / 100 - (datetime->year - 1) / 400 - 15)
> > +         * SECPERDAY;
> > +
> >    ret += monthssum[datetime->month - 1] * SECPERDAY;
> > -  if (ay == 3 && datetime->month >= 3)
> > +  is_bisextile = ay == 3
> > +                 && (datetime->year % 100 != 0 || datetime->year % 400
> == 0);
>
> Again...
>
> is_bisextile = (ay == 3 && (datetime->year % 100 != 0 || datetime->year %
> 400 == 0)) ? true : false;
>
> > +  if (is_bisextile && datetime->month >= 3)
>
> is_bisextile == true && ...
>
> >      ret += SECPERDAY;
> >
> >    ret += (datetime->day - 1) * SECPERDAY;
> >    if ((datetime->day > months[datetime->month - 1]
> > -       && (!ay || datetime->month != 2 || datetime->day != 29))
> > +       && !(is_bisextile && datetime->month == 2 && datetime->day ==
> 29))
>
> is_bisextile == true && ...
>
> ... and I would drop "is_" from variable name...
>
> Daniel
>
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to