At Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:10:58 -0700, Patrick Alken wrote: > Ah I hadn't considered this issue. If there are other areas of GSL > which have the same issues maybe we should keep a list so when there > is a major new release like 2.0 we could integrate these "extra" > workspaces?
I've put the following in the toplevel TODO file. We should probably make 2.0 the next release after this. Changes for Release 2.0 Break binary compatibility, but keep source compatibility. * Add a 'void *' to all workspaces, to allow for future changes. * Disable deprecated functions * Fix up the workspace_alloc functions so they have consistent names (add functions where needed, don't remove) > Of course one problem with that is if we have a separate workspace > for bspline derivatives it may never be convenient to integrate it > with the normal bspline workspace. True, unfortunately I don't see any easy way round that.
