On 7/6/15 1:33 PM, Matthias Sitte wrote:
> It's not yet fully
> finished, but I'd like to hear your thoughts on it in general, and how to
> proceed if you want to incorporate it into GSL at some point (in terms of
> requirements etc).

Reading up on the GSL design manual [1], I guess that implementing a "standalone
package" version on top of the current GSL library would be the best way to
develop it. If the new interface turns out to be stable and decent, GSL
maintainer could try to (but would not need to) merge it into the then-stable 
GSL?

  Matthias

[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/design/gsl-design.html#SEC3

Reply via email to