Hi Tomeu, and thanks for your answer, On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:59:20AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: ... > > that's certainly very interesting. Sugar's code is open and at some > point I think we'll see countries patching its source code in order to > customize the software further than just adding/removing activities or > changing the language. > > I hope that this can be done in a concerted way that doesn't bring > duplication of efforts and everybody can share the advances of each > participant. >
Exactly, that's one of the goals i'm looking for. Idealy, that customization wouldn't apply to country-level only, Colombian cultural richness is thanks to more than 90 ethnic groups, some of them have big differences between eatch other. I have already the experience of a rejection of software by one of this group, because it had elements of another one. > Feel free to ask in the sugar ml any questions you have about that. > Well, the first question would be if there are some issues already identified around this. Maybe directionality (no only in texts, but in all the interface), iconography, time/space concepts, interaction between individuals, etc? Zoom metaphor uses truly a great concept, do you have info about how it was conceived? > Tomeu Best regards, Santiago
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gsoc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/gsoc
