Re: sk_mean value for multivariate indicator simulation

[Edzer J. Pebesma]

Michael Bock wrote:

> The only thing I have no idea about is the value
> of sk_mean (0.28, 0.56, 0.85). Its far away from the measured values in
> the used data file 'zinc.eas'. How are these values of sk_mean built??
> 
They're approximately equal to the sample mean values of the three 
respective indicator transformed zinc variables.
--
Edzer