Hi Charles, Iam following globus quickstart guide for 4.0.x and in chapter 1 section 3.3
When I run this command > grid-ca-request -host 'hostname' ( I get the following error) Error, argument -host : localhost.localdomain may not contain localhost or localdomain. Syntax :grid-cert-request [-help] [options ....] My hostname is > # hostname Localhost.localdomain Please help me out with this. What do I need to do. Though the above command run when I give 127.0.0.1. but not with localhost.localdomain ( which is my hostname) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Bacon Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 4:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gt-user] Simple CA / OpenSSL Version / libssl.so.4 I bet the difference is going from 4->5 more so than going from RHAS- >RHWS. Future binaries of 4.2.x will include RHAP5, which will hopefully work for you on RHWS. Charles On Nov 19, 2008, at 3:23 PM, Ralph Grove wrote: > We used the RHAS4 binary, which I hoped would be compatible with > RHWS. Evidently not, so we'll try building from source instead. > > Thanks, > Ralph Grove > > Charles Bacon wrote: >> Did you build from source, or install from binaries? If binaries, >> which binaries? The builds are sensitive to being linked against >> 0.9.7 or 0.9.8, and the binaries are not compatible between those >> versions. >> >> >> Charles >> >> On Nov 19, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Ralph Grove wrote: >> >> >>> I'm working through the Simple CA install, and have got to step 5, >>> verification of the certificate installation. The grid-proxy-init >>> command is throwing this error: >>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ grid-proxy-init -debug -verify >>> grid-proxy-init: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.4: >>> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory >>> >>> The host system (RHEL WS/5) has libssl.so.6 installed (package >>> OpenSSL 0.9.8b-10.el5), but it's evidently not backwards compatible. >>> I tried linking libssl.so.4 and libcrypto.so.4 to the newer >>> versions, but that results in a segmentation fault. >>> >>> Has anyone else encountered this problem? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ralph Grove >>> >>>
